It’s an open declaration that even the people in charge of the mint are now churning out counterfeit coins, publishing “peer-reviewed” journals that have no functional review process. An automated.
While peer review is an essential part of both the scientific and academic publishing world, it seems to have only recently gained some momentum in software development, where even modest applications.
In her article, Haug notes a disturbing trend in peer review, specifically peer review evaluations that are outright fraudulent. Noting that in August, Springer retracted 64 articles from ten.
So wrote Kent Anderson, who has served as a publishing exec at several top journals, including Science and the New England Journal of Medicine, in a recent blog post. Again, Kent Anderson: “Even the.
Albert Einstein Young Adult Images of Albert Einstein or bearded ancient Greeks, reinforced by other notions on gender and braininess conveyed in media, can loom large in the minds of children, adolescents and young
HASBROUCK HEIGHTS, N.J., Jan. 15, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation (NASDAQ: NYMX) reports today that a new peer review article has been published in Therapeutic Advances in.
Peer review at scholarly journals involves recruiting experts to evaluate a paper before it is approved for publication. When a paper is submitted, the editors send it to two or three reviewers who.
Transparency is important in helping journals focus on the quality and rigour of the research process rather than its likely impact, originality and even fashion. A vital part of this opening up of.
Many believe that there is something sacred about the process by which manuscripts undergo peer-review by journals. A rigorous study described in a thoughtful paper is sent out to leading experts, who.
The articles were retracted after editors found the authors had faked the peer-review process using phony e-mail addresses. The latest news further undermines what has been the pride of scientific.
The Association for Psychological Science latest issue of Perspectives on Psychological Science has a few interesting articles about the research and publishing side of psychology. about the.
Journals do not meet their own transparency standards and should expose their peer review practices to full scrutiny. North American academics say that despite pushing policies to promote openness in.
How Does An Entomologist Study Insects “That’s how bad it is—they need to borrow someone,” says Goddard, an extension professor of medical entomology at Mississippi State University. “We can’t find people to investigate an outbreak.”. Nov
3 Visiting Scholar, METRICS, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA. How can editors secure resources to evaluate peer review practices at their journals? Publishers can take an active role.
The knowledge and skills needed to write an academic journal article for publication and then to successfully negotiate the peer review process are complex. She also explores issues on educational.
Others offered to expedite publishing (at a speed that could not possibly allow for any peer review) for additional costs. The journals in this case are scams. Without the expense of real editors and.
This opinion piece underwent open peer review – as is the case with all BMC series clinical journals – which means the authors and reviewers identities are known to each other. In addition, the.
The week at Retraction Watch featured a look at a school where everyone has published in possibly predatory journals, and doubts about a study of doing math unconsciously. Here’s what was happening.
The debacle must have seemed like déjà vu to Alex Holcombe, a University of Sydney psychology professor. In 2011, he and a small group of academics wrote a protest letter to seven journals that employ.
What Unit Of Measurement Was Use By James Watt The virtual utility was cased and raided within weeks by what Wilhoit said he believes was PLA Unit 61398, based on the custom code used and other evidence. a Republican-led
Data publishers should have the option of submitting their biodiversity datasets. is to include the option of peer review," the authors write. "Data publication can be similar to the conventional.
You do not need to copyedit a paper — that is generally the job of the journal that has asked you to review the article. But any suggestions for improving the language more generally will be welcome,